The use of the term fascism

How can a movement like Vox which wants to affirm the primacy of catholicity over the State over the nation over education be described as fascist when the primacy of fascism was that of politics that of the State We have reached such a point of confusion that there are those who are not able to distinguish a nationalist movement of Catholic inspiration that holds positions of the Catholic extreme right on issues associated with issues such as the family where it is decidedly opposed to abortion and feminism from fascism itself. The same happens with Salvini and La Liga.



How can a movement like The League which has historically advocated Russia Mobile Number List secession of a region from Italy be fascist when one of the fundamental points of fascism is the unity of the nation which was always considered sacred Things as you mentioned in your question go even further .has become so simplistic that it can be applied to everyone from Trump to Putin. Any authoritarian regime with a cult of a leader is called fascism. North Korea would then be fascist communist China itself would be fascist. Evidently this does not help us understand the contemporary phenomena we face.

url=https://bcellphonelist.com/russia-mobile-database/][/url]


This use deprives the category fascism of the components that really belong to it and that can only be found if we analyze them in history. In summary what I am trying to convey is that many times it is maintained that this or that movement is fascist because its ideas include racist positions or appeals to the purity of the nation or because it despises representative democracy. But all these ideas precede fascism. Just because there is racism or authoritarianism does not mean there is fascism. These are not specific qualities of fascism but they appeared even in other latitudes and still persist.